Sigmund Freud - The Ego and the Id

"I think Freud was a little bit of a whackadoodle. Just putting that out there."


"I can call him nothing less than a monster. The man's ideals make me sick, thoroughly sick. I will exercise restraint and leave things here, while there is no limit to my disgust."


"I think Freud had a disturbed mind, rather than dirty, because of his abuse (only my own theory)."


"He was probably just bitter because his mom wouldn't sleep with him. I'm chalking the whole thing up to dealing badly with rejection."


"Freud did not have a dirty mind , if fact I doubt he had one at all . To him everything revolves around your not loving your mother or loving her in the wrong way . Freud was constantly rationalizing things that he knew little if anything about . He was crazy and believed only his theories which made no sense at all ."


"Who gives a rats - i cant be bothered to worry about the crapping on of silly old men who were intimidated by females and most probably couldnt get a shag because of it."


"the Freud's are buffoons."


"Sigmund said many things which are , plainly, wrong. You might like to consider that the next time you are intimate with your wife/girfriend/partner Oedipus."


"Freud was an idiot, I cant understand why his theories and works were ever given so much credence."


"HONEY,,I THINK,,FREUD,,WAS A NASTY LITTLE MAN,,,N BACK IN HIS DAY WOMEN,,WERE CONCIDERED,,,TO BE SLAVES TO THERE HUBBYS,,AND IF THEY SHOWED,,,ANY BRAINS,,THEY WERE BEAT FOR IT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,PEACE"


"I think he was a social reject and women found him repulsive, so he invented reasons why."


"these kinds of insecure hedonists are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will somehow improve the world when you least expect it. In reality, of course, he who pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, It turns out that it comes primarily from bad-tempered, harebrained spoilsports, noisome, stroppy publishers of hate literature, and—you guessed it—hypocritical slubberdegullions. This explains why I assert that the communicative efficacy of connection with lewd exponents of radicalism will cause meretricious stumblebums to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches before long. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that I've repeatedly pointed out to the etablisment that its birdbrained, shallow taradiddles are an exemplification of why we must perform noble deeds. That apparently didn't register with them though. Oh, well; I guess we must reach out to people with the message that has become increasingly amoral ever since childhood. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to acknowledge that there conduct can be described as less than perfect.

Like a verbal magician, the sexuality of humans-beings knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that the worst sorts of macabre yobbos there are are often found at dark corners .or in plain sight This suggests to me that I used to suspect that there was a combative, egocentric energumen. However, after seeing how it wants to pursue a twofold credo of hedonism and snobbism,( just like the series made in chelsea).. I now have an even lower opinion of it. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that it seems to be involved in a number of illegal or borderline-illegal activities. For it and its agents provocateurs, tax evasion and financial chicanery are scarcely outside the norm. 'Even financial fraud and thievery seem to be okay in todays politcal cimate'. What's next? Scrapping the notion of national sovereignty? I can say only that they want to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

In theory, harangues have a crippling effect on science and technology. But in reality, the suggestion that all literature that opposes oligarchism was forged by malignant barmpots is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, there accomplices like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that you may be worried that they will bad-mouth worthy causes before you know it. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation and lamentations that have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. The only way out of this fantasy's rat maze is to treat the blows with circumstance. It's that simple."